Temporarily Offline
Until the creator of AsideShop gets around to upgrading his/her plugin, I will be turning off the syndication for my lifestream here. I have set up a temporary reprieve at FriendFeed until I can get things back online.
DO NOT UPGRADE TO WORDPRESS 2.8 IF YOU DEPEND ON ASIDESHOP.
June 29, 2009 No Comments
DON’T GET THAT COLLEGE DEGREE! – New York Post
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
If You’re Taking Away Features From Users, Don’t Tell Them It’s For Their Own Benefit
The latest example is online music streaming site imeem. The company has struggled of late under absolutely draconian terms forced on it by the record labels. Rumors held that the company came close to going out of business until Warner Music agreed to renegotiate its suffocating deal. Still, there are many who question how the company can survive without a drastic change in business models. But, taking away features from customers with little warning and pretending it's a good thing isn't exactly the best way to go about things. Clay Shirky points us to the news that imeem is removing features for users to upload videos or pictures without even offering a "download to save" option. But, even worse, the blog post announcing the change tries to play this up as good news again, saying that it's all about "simplifying imeem" as part of an effort to enhance the site.
Sure, simplifying a site can be a good thing -- but unilaterally removing features that people use, with little warning, isn't really simplifying. You can simplify without removing features. If you have to remove features, for whatever reason, why not at least admit the truth: it's not for consumer's benefit, but for some other reason, and you realize it sucks for many users.
In other words, sound human, rather acting like your users are morons. If you want to see a company that's actually done a good job of this, look at Hulu. While we think it's ridiculous that the company caved in to content providers and tried (and failed) to block a specific browser (Boxee) from viewing its content, at least Hulu's CEO was upfront and honest about the fact that it sucked:
The maddening part of writing this blog entry is that we realize that there is no immediate win here for users. Please know that we take very seriously our role of representing users such that we are able to provide more and more content in more and more ways over time. We embrace this activity in ways that respect content owners' -- and even the entire industry's -- challenges to create great content that users love. Yes, it's a complex matter. A tough mission, and a never-ending one, but one we are passionately committed to.eMusic, imeem and others would be wise to take note. Taking features away and pretending your customers are stupid enough to believe it's for their benefit isn't likely to fly.
For those Boxee users reading this post, we understand and appreciate that you're likely to tell us that we're nuts. Please know that we do share the same interests and won't stop innovating in support of the bigger mission.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
via imgur.com So true. Pixar > Dreamworks.
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: Just felt something tickle my foot. Turned around to pet Piper, but she was nowhere near my feet. I’m officially freaked out.
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
Blogging to the Middle: Simplifying Financial Aid Applications
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
Amber – This Is Your Night
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: Sometimes, you just need some ’90’s dance music. Like today! ♫ http://blip.fm/~935jq
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
Make a DIY Macro Lens from Old Binoculars
A high-end macro lens for your camera can easily run upwards of a thousand dollars, but you can make a super-simple macro lens for a few bucks out of old binoculars.
If you have a pair of old binoculars laying around and a roll of electrical tape, you'll be able to complete your DIY macro lens with no cash outlay. If you're short of both, you'll need to keep an eye out for some old binoculars at a garage sale or thrift store.
Your total cost for the project should be under $5 or so with some careful secondhand shopping. Check out the video below to see just how easy it is to scavenge the parts from some old binoculars to make a poor man's macro lens:
What you end up with is no substitution for a $1,000 Nikon Micro-Nikkor lens, but a little compromise is in order when you're spending 1/200th the amount and using electrical tape to hold things together. If you have your own clever, and hopefully thrifty, photography hacks to share, sound off in the comments below.
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
“Hate crime law is, ideally, a way to punish someone for committing a form of terrorism, targeting…”
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: I hope it wasn’t one of the neighborhood kids banging on the door this morning. #getoffmylawn
June 29, 2009 Comments Off
Coffee Drinks Illustrated (via twoeyes)
June 28, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: @thespianduckie @captainskyhawk Indeed. =)
June 28, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: It’s been SUCH a fantastic day. I am SO happy. It’s the little things in life, folks. The little things. ^_^
June 28, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: Minimal tweeting today: busy all morning, will be busy all afternoon.
June 28, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: Minimal tweeting today: busy all morning, will be busy all afternoon.
June 28, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: @etoile Aw, that sucks! =( What happened to it?
June 27, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: I’ll play more tomorrow — I’m now a Big Daddy.
June 27, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: FINALLY. Jesus. =P
June 27, 2009 Comments Off
nscaletti: …if STEAM even starts… =/
June 27, 2009 Comments Off



